Joga Hial v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
A BLAPL was disposed of as not pressed because the petitioner's counsel indicated no desire to press the application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.99 of 2023
Joga Hial …. Petitioner
Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
22.03.2023
Order No.
03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the
Petitioner does not want to press this BLAPL.
2. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of as not
pressed.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
PKS
Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joga Hial
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
Justice V. Narasigh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court