Hon'ble High Court of Orissa, noting that trial had commenced and witnesses were examined, declined to entertain the bail application at this stage but granted leave to renew before the Court in seisin.
Leave granted to renew before the Court in seisin; otherwise application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 6633 of 2023
Daulat Prasad Kashyap @ Omu …. Petitioner
Mr. M.K. Mohapatro, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. H.K. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 15.11.2023
Order No.
05. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Page 1 of 2
Judge
Soumya
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Nov-2023 19:48:41
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a bail application after trial has commenced and witnesses have been examined.
Whether leave can be granted to renew the bail prayer before the court in seisin.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Daulat Prasad Kashyap @ Omu
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
