The High Court refused to entertain a leave application for modification due to the petitioner's criminal antecedents. However, it granted leave to renew the prayer before the trial court for consideration on its own merits.
I.A. stood disposed; leave granted to renew prayer before trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 284 of 2023
Nirmal Sahoo @ Beda @ Chitta …. Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 02.11.2023 Order No. 10. I.A. No.1427 of 2023
1 . Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Signature Not Verified (V. NARASINGH) Digitally Signed Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL Soumya Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 03-Nov-2023 15:01:41
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain an indefinite leave application petition (I.A.) for modification.
Nirmal Sahoo @ Beda @ Chitta
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
