Petitioner, accused in dacoity with 8 prior criminal antecedents, filed bail application relying on release of co-accused. Bench denied bail due to antecedents and disparity with co-accused status.
Bail application disposed of without granting release.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 1670 of 2023
Nutan Naik
Petitioner
Mr. D. Sethi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
Opposite Party
Mr. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
05.09.2023
Order No.
07.
Page 1 of 2
T.I. Parade and there has been recovery of a sword at the instance of the petitioner and he has criminal antecedents.
Signature Not Verified (V. NARASINGH) Digitally Signed Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Ayesha Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 05-Sep-2023 18:16:36
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail given his 8 criminal antecedents and the non-availability of parity with released co-accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nutan Naik
State of Odisha
V. Narasingh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
