Madhusudan Rout @ Manna v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The BLAPL stands dismissed for non-prosecution, as the petitioner's counsel submitted that he had no instruction in the matter.
What did the court decide?
None.
The BLAPL stands dismissed for non-prosecution, as the petitioner's counsel submitted that he had no instruction in the matter.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.140 of 2023
Madhusudan Rout @ …. Manna
Petitioner
Mr.P.Ch. Sejpada, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
Opp. Party
Order No.
Mr.Manoranjan Mishra
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
11.05.2023
This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
Mr.P.Ch. Sejpada, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he has no instruction in the
matter.
The BLAPL stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
PRAMOD Digitally signed by ( S.K. Sahoo) KUMAR PRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO Date: 2023.05.12 15:44:06 Judge SAHOO +05'30'
( S.K. Sahoo)
PKSahoo
Madhusudan Rout
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court