The High Court of Orissa dismissed an application for bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. as the petitioner was absent and no counsel appeared. The matter was adjourned previously, and non-prosecution was recorded due to absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.11135 of 2023
Rakesh Das @ Mantu
…. Petitioner
None
Vs.
State of Odisha
….. Opposite Party Mr.S.S. Pradhan, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
06.12.2023
Order No.
(Through hybrid mode)
connection with Naugaon P.S. Case No. 186 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1236 of 2023 pending in the Court of the learned
S.D.J.M., Jagatsinghpur under Sections 379, 34 of IPC.
filed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence the matter has been adjourned to today.
for non-prosecution.
Signature Not Verified
………………………...
Digitally Signed (SAVITRI RATHO) Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA
Designation: Personal Assistant JUDGE
Reason: Authentication puspa Location: Orissa High Court Date: 06-Dec-2023 18:46:08
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner who did not appear in court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rakesh Das @ Mantu
State of Odisha
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
