In an appeal against rejection of bail in a POCSO case, the Court refused to entertain the application at this stage as the victim/informant failed to appear despite service of notice, leaving the plea for renewal upon examination of the victim.
Leave granted to renew claim before the learned Court after examination of the victim and her mother.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.102 of 2023
Chanda @ Chandra Sekhar …. Petitioner Mishra
Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
22.03.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Judge (POCSO), Rayagada, by order dated 25.08.2022, the present BLAPL has been filed.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail in a POCSO case where the victim has not appeared despite notice being served.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chanda @ Chandra Sekhar
State of Odisha
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
