Disposes of an ABLAPL arising from a case pending in the Special Court, Bolangir. The court held that since the petitioner firm was not named in the charge sheet, the apprehension of arrest no longer survives.
The ABLAPL is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.6410 of 2023
SSD Traders, Cuttack
…. Petitioner
Mr. A.R.Nayak,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 08.11.2023.
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 09-Nov-2023 11:04:25
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the apprehension of arrest survived after the petitioner firm was not named in the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SSD Traders, Cuttack
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
