The petitioner, Chittaranjan Nayak, stated that he did not wish to press his ABLAPL. The shop order consequently disposed of the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.5133 of 2023
Chittaranjan Nayak
…. Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & another …. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Maharaj, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
02.11.2023
Order No.
03. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the
Petitioner does not want to press this ABLAPL.
2. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of as not
pressed.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
PKS
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: PRADEEP KUMAR SWAIN Designation: A.R.-cum-Sr. Secy. Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Nov-2023 12:11:13
Page 1 of 1
Chittaranjan Nayak
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
