In this writ petition concerning pension continuation, the High Court disposed of the matter by referring to a previous order in W.P.(C) No. 901 of 2017, directing authorities to pass appropriate orders within three months.
Direction to authorities to consider the order in W.P.(C) No. 901 of 2017 and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (OAC) No. 524 of 2015
Basantilata Pal and others
….. Petitioners
Mr. G.R. Sethi, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite parties
Mr. M. Balabantaray, Standing Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
21.02.2022
Order No.
02
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow petitioners to continue under old pension rules based on previous court order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
order dated 10.01.2022Referred¶4
W.P.(C) No. 901 of 2017
Basantilata Pal
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
