Dismissed

Hrudananda Naik v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC5 May 2022WPC(OAC)/4199/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa, Coram Justice M.S. Sahoo, disposed of a writ petition by directing the State of Odisha to refund Rs. 27,110/- representing excess deposits made by the petitioner against mandatory dues. The Court ordered immediate refund if not already done and directed issuance of a certified copy.

What did the court decide?

Order directing the refund of Rs. 27,110/- to the petitioner with instructions to issue an urgent certified copy.

Hrudananda Naik Vs State of Odisha — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

WPC(OAC) No. 4199 of 2013

¶3

Hrudananda Naik

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Sameer Ku. Das, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha & others

¶8

…. Opp. Parties

¶9

Mr. T.K. Praharaj, Standing Counsel

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

¶12

ORDER Order No. 05.05.2022 03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. In the counter filed by opposite parties 2 and 3 dated 26.10.2018 before the learned Tribunal at paragraph-3 to 6, the following has been stated :-

¶13

¶14

“3. That in reply to para 6(4), it is submitted that the applicant’s resignation was accepted on 21.11.2013. As per the Govt. order (placed as Annexure-4 of the applicant) Rs.1,00,000/- was to be deposited by the candidate and instead of that an amount of Rs.27,110/- has been paid by him in excess. 4. That in reply to para 6(5) to 6(7) it is submitted that the candidate paid Rs.1,27,000/- (Rupees one lakh twenty seven thousands one hundred ten) only instead Rs,1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh) only, The excess amount was not taken intentionally but due to wrong calculation. 5. That in reply to para 6(8) it is submitted that later on, an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was recovered from each who resigned from service. 6. That in reply to para 6(9) it is submitted that had the applicant put his grievance before the authority then, the matter would have been subsided then & there. However, the excess amount of Rs. 27,110/- will be refunded to him.”

¶15

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

petitioner that in terms of paragraph-6, the amount of Rs.27,110/- is to be refunded.

¶18

In view of the submissions made at the bar, the writ petition is disposed of observing that the amount of Rs. 27,110/- is to be refunded forthwith, if not refunded in the meantime. Since the matter is pending from 2013, expeditious steps are to be taken by the authority on production of certified copy of this order.

¶19

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

¶20

Copy of this order be uploaded.

¶21

(M.S. Sahoo)

¶22

Judge

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Hrudananda Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hrudananda Naik v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suprangya Mishra Vs the Secy. Dept. of S and Me, Odisha

Ruksana Sultana Vs Block Education Officer, Cuttack

Sukanti Mukhi Vs State of Odisha

Dr.Tribikram Debata Vs State of Odisha

Surendra Kumar Das Vs State of Odisha

Sasmita Sahu Vs State of Odisha