The Court held the writ petition infructuous due to efflux of time as the cause of action did not survive, but granted liberty to approach the court anew if any cause of action remains.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No.3305 of 2012
Muralidhar Nayak …. Petitioner
Mr.M.K.Mohanty, Adv.
-versus-
…. State of Odisha & others Opposite Parties Mr.Biswajeet Mohanty, SC
(For School and Mass Education)
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI ORDER
Order No.
05
18.02.2022
1 .This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2 . None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
3 . The petitioner has approached before the Tribunal in the year 2012 challenging the orders of suspension and fixation of Headquarters vide Annexures 6 and 7. But by efflux of time the WPC(OAC) has lost its relevance and cause of action raised therein does not seem to be surviving. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
( S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
LB
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the orders of suspension and fixation of Headquarters has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Whether liberty to approach the court afresh regarding any surviving cause of action should be granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muralidhar Nayak
State of Odisha
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
