Allowed

Ananta Charan Hotta v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC9 Sept 2022WPC(OAC)/1204/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought quashing of an order and direction for regularisation of service and release of pension benefits similarly to Job Contract Workers. The court, having noted a similar claim was already allowed and confirmed, directed the respondents to extend the benefits without legal impediment within three months. The petition was then disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to extend regularisation and pension benefits as allowed in similar matter within three months.

Ananta Charan Hotta Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) (OAC) No.1204 of 2016

¶3

Ananta Charan Hotta

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha & Others

¶7

…. Opposite Parties

¶8

COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

09.09.2022

Order No

3. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

¶13

2. Heard Mr. S.K.Mishra, learned counsel for Petitioner, Mr.R.N.Mishra, learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and Mr. S.K.Patra, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.5.

¶14

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶15

(ii) Call for the records.

¶16

(iii) quash the letter dated 18.01.2013 under Annexure-13 and direct to the Respondents to consider the case of the applicant for regularization of his service as well as release the pension as regular pension under Annexure9Series similarly to Job Contract Workers and release the financial and pensionary benefits as per Odisha Government Service Rules within a stipulated period.

¶17

And / or pass any other appropriate direction / directions, order / orders in the fitness of the case.

¶18

And for this act of kindness the applicants shall as in duty bound ever pray”.

¶19

// 2 //

¶20

4. It is submitted that similar claim has allowed by the learned Tribunal in its order dtd. 03.04.2019 in OA No.1106 of 2015 under Annexure-10. It is also submitted that the said order passed by the learned Tribunal was confirmed by this Court in its order dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.(C) No.29224 of 2020.

¶21

5. In view of the fact that similar claim has been allowed by the learned Tribunal and confirmed by this Court, this Court directs Opp.Party to extend the benefit as prayed for in the writ Petition, if there is no other legal impediment. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶22

Subrat

¶23

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge

¶24

Page 2 of 2

Ananta Charan Hotta v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananta Charan Hotta v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumuda Ranjan Meher Vs State of Odisha

Satya Sain Meher Vs State of Odisha

Debendra Kandi Vs State of Odisha

Mamata Nag Vs S.Praveen Kumar, I.G. of Police (Personal), Cuttack

Ratnakar Kar Vs State of Odisha

Nrusingha Prasad Das Vs State of Odisha