Amulya Kumar Jena v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses WPC(OAC) No.1140 of 2014 for lack of instruction from the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No.1140 of 2014
Amulya Kumar Jena
…. Petitioner Mr.A.Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & Ors.
…. Opposite Party(s)
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
29.03.2022
Order No.
01.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no
instruction from the petitioner involving the Writ Petition.
2. The Writ Petition stands dismissed for no instruction.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
S.P. Dash
Page 1 of 1
Amulya Kumar Jena
State of Orissa
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court