Justice Biswanath Rath held that the writ petition stood dismissed as infructuous, based on the submission that the underlying matter had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OA) NO.746 OF 2017
Surya Narayan Mahapatra …. Petitioner
Mr.L.Samal, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & ors. …. Opposite Party(s)
Mr.S.Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
25.8.2022
Order No.
1. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter
has gone infructuous.
2. In the circumstance, the Writ Petition stands dismissed being
infructuous.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires disposal as the matter has become infructuous?
Surya Narayan Mahapatra
State of Odisha & ors.
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
