This High Court disposed of a writ petition via video conference in the absence of the petitioner, refusing adjournment due to the case's age, and granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum if a cause of action survives.
Writ petition disposed of; liberty granted to approach appropriate forum if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 343 of 2009
O.N.G.F.A.Gajapati Zone Service
….
Petitioner
M/s L.Samal & Associates
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. ….
Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER 12.01.2022 This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call. 3. Since it is an year old matter, this Court is not inclined to grant adjournment. However, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if any cause of action still survives.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Arun
Page 1 of 1
ONGFAGajapati Zone Service
State of Odisha
B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
