Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Barsha Construction Vs Mcl — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Barsha Construction Vs MclBarsha Construction v. Mcl

Disposed

Barsha Construction v. Mcl

Orissa HC11 Mar 2022WP(C)/9679/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because it was stated that it had become so by the efflux of time.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 9679 of 2011

M/s. Barsha Construction

….. Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Sanganeria, Advocate

Vs.

Mahanadi Coalfields & Others

….. Opposite parties Mr. R. Sharma, Advocate (O.P.1-3)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

11.03.2022

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

W.P.(C) No. 9679 of 2011W.P.(C) No. 9679 of 2011

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s. Barsha Construction
respondent
Mahanadi Coalfields & Others

Coram

AI extract

B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 11 Mar 2022 · March
Registered: 11 Apr 2011
Case no.: WP(C)/9679/2011

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Miss Savitri Ratho

Uttama Reddy Vs Secy,Nce and Research
10 Mar 2022
Naba Kishore Sahoo Vs State and Ors.
10 Mar 2022
Krupasindhu Sahoo Vs State of Odisha
10 Mar 2022
Sangram Ku.Biswal Vs State
11 Mar 2022

Cite this judgement

Barsha Construction v. Mcl, WP(C)/9679/2011 (OD), decided on 11 March 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

W.P.(C) No. 9679 of 2011W.P.(C) No. 9679 of 2011

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

B.R. Sarangi and Savitri Ratho

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous on the ground that time had passed since the filing of the petition.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

04.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ
petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed
of as infructuous.
……………………...
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
…………….…………..…….
( SAVITRI RATHO )
JUDGE
Alok / Sukanta

Savitri Ratho

CNR

ODHC010325982011

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

B.r.sarangi Miss Savitri Ratho

Disposal

Disposed Off

M.Viswanath Raju Vs State of Orissa

11 Mar 2022

Mahabir Pr.Dodka Vs State and Ors.

11 Mar 2022