The court disposed of the writ petition directed against the imposition of penalty without a show cause notice. It directed the Regional Transport Officer to accept the Mobile Vehicle Tax and issue a show cause notice for the penalty.
Directed the opposite party to accept M.V. Tax and issue a show cause notice for penalty; the W.P. stands disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.903 of 2022
Manish Enterprises
…. Petitioner
-versus-
Regional Transport Officer, Rayagada
…. Opposite Party
CORAM:THE JUSTICE S.PUJAHARI
Order
No.
ORDER
19.01.2022
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. The defects pointed out by the S.R are ignored. The
matter is taken up for final disposal on the consent of both the
parties.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
this Court directs the opposite party to accept the M.V. Tax from the Petitioner. But, so far as the imposition of penalty is concerned, the opposite party shall ask the Petitioner for a show cause and after filing such show cause, the same shall be disposed of in the manner known to law with regard to the liability of penalty to be imposed on the Petitioner.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
SKB
2 issues framed by the court
Whether penalty can be imposed without issuing a show cause notice.
Whether the Mobile Vehicle Tax should be accepted from the petitioner.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sujit Kumar Dhir and Others vrs. Regional Transport Office, Keonjhar and OthersExplained¶14
2014 (II) OLR 1070
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish Enterprises
Regional Transport Officer, Rayagada
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
