Lalit Mohan Nayak v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stood disposed of for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 7772 of 2011
Lalit Mohan Nayak ….. Petitioner Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Adv. Vs.
State of Orissa & Ors.
….. Opposite parties Standing Counsel S&ME
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
09.03.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 8 2. Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter.
Lalit Mohan Nayak
State of Orissa
B.R. Sarangi
Savitri Rathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court