Petitioner sought writ direction to cover him under earlier pension rules and GPF subscription rules based on ratio in Anand Dash. Court granted liberty to file fresh representation.
Liberty granted to file fresh representation within two weeks for consideration within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.650 OF 2022
Jugal Bagarty
Petitioner
Mr. K.Swain, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
11.01.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
1
2
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be brought under the Odisha Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1992 prior to its amendment.
Whether the petitioner is allowed to subscribe for GPF under the G.P.F. (O) Rules, 1938 prior to its amendment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Anand Dash v. State of OdishaReferred¶3
Anand Dash v. State of Odisha, 2014 ILRCUT-459
SLP Nos. 35462-35464 of 2014Referred¶3
Sabita MohapatraReferred¶3
Sabita Mohapatra (O.A. No. 2501 of 2013)
Jugal Bagarty
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
