3.1 It is his submission that although the area of the land in question remained intact, but the configuration of the map has been changed for which the Petitioners are likely to lose the land in question, over which their residential house situates. The Commissioner, without taking into consideration the real matter in controversy, directed the Tahasildar, Darpan-Opposite Party No.2 to conduct field enquiry by issuing notice to the boundary tenants and Petitioners as well as the land owners likely to be affected and after superimposition of the map as per map published in the year 1925-26 with that of the map of 1996 for correction if required. It is his submission that the error crept in the map of 1925-26. The Commissioner ought to have directed to compare and superimpose the map published in the year 1910-11 and 1925-26 with that of 1996 to find out the correct position. Accordingly, he prays for setting aside of the impugned order and to direct Tahasildar, Darpan to make field enquiry and correct the map of 1996 by superimposing it with map of 1910-11.