The High Court of Orissa directed the Collector and District Magistrate to decide the petitioner's representation regarding land acquisition compensation within eight weeks without expressing an opinion on the merits before disposing of the writ petition.
Direction to opposite party No. 2 to take a decision within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5671 of 2022
Uttam Kumar Mohanty
…. Petitioner
Mr. R.K. Acharya, Advocate -versus-
Union of India & another …. Opp. Parties
Mr. B.K. Padhi, Central Government Counsel
Order No.
Mr. H.M. Dhal,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
04.04.2022
// 2 //
date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
Prasant
(Biswajit Mohanty)
Judge
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court shall direct the Collector to Decide the petitioner's representation regarding land acquisition compensation within a specific time period.
Uttam Kumar Mohanty
Union of India
Nayagarh District Magistrate
Biswajit Mohanty
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
