Petitioner sought refund of enhanced royalty under OMMC Rules, 2004. Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of the order in M/s. Durga Condev Private Limited case, with hesitation on the exact judicial treatment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 5577 of 2016
Bhimsen Nanda
….. Petitioner Mr. G.M. Rath. Advocate.
Vs.
State of Odisha & others ….. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P.Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 07.09.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Ashok/Kishore
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund of royalty enhanced under OMMC Rules, 2004 based on previous orders in Durga Condev and Akuli Charan Das cases.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M/s. Durga Condev Private Limited Vrs. State of Odisha and othersFollowed¶17
M/s. Durga Condev Private Limited Vrs. State of Odisha and others W.P.(C) No. 3025 of 2014
Akuli Charan Das etc. Vrs. State of Orissa and othersFollowed¶13
Akuli Charan Das etc. Vrs. State of Orissa and others reported in A.I.R. 2007 Orissa 197 · Who else cites this
Bhimsen Nanda
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
