The petitioner filed a withdrawal memo on instruction, leading the Single Judge to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed.
The writ petition was not pressed and dismissed due to the filing of a withdrawal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.5458 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Umakanta Bark …. Petitioner
Mr. Mr. Ajaya Kumar Jena, Advocate
-versus-
…. The Regional Director, Reserve Opposite Parties Bank of India, BBSR and others
Mr. Jena, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
27.06.2022
Order No.
03. 1. Mr. Jena, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and
submits, on instruction received from his client he has filed withdrawal
memo of date.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
Prasant
Page 1 of 2
Umakanta Bark
The Regional Director, Reserve Opposite Parties Bank of India, BBSR and others
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
