Allowed

M/S Sai Enterprises,Jagatsinghpur v. the Principal Commnr.,Cgst,Ce and Customs,Bbsr

Orissa HC18 Jan 2022WP(C)/516/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court of Orissa, through a notice via video conferencing, granted an order condoning the delay in the petitioner's application for revocation of a GST order. The court directed that pending payment of taxes, interest, and fees, the application be accepted and the portal opened for filing returns.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned; petitioner to deposit taxes, interest, and fees; proper officer to open portal for filing GST return; writ petition disposed.

M/S Sai Enterprises,Jagatsinghpur Vs the Principal… — GST and Indirect Tax | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.516 of 2022

¶2

…. Petitioner Ms. K. R. Choudhury, Advocate

¶3

M/s. Sai Enterprises, Jagatsinghpur

¶4

-versus-

¶5

…. The Principal Commissioner, CGST, Opposite Parties Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar and others

¶6

Mr. R. S. Chimanka, Sr. Standing Counsel for I.T.

¶7

CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK

Order No.

ORDER 18.01.2022

This matter is taken up by a separate notice through video conferencing mode.

¶12

Mr. R. S. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel (CT & GST) appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc. due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties.

¶13

In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

etc. due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law.

¶16

A copy of this order will be produced by the Petitioner before the proper officer, and subject to the Petitioner complying with the above conditions, the proper officer will open the portal to enable the Petitioner to file the GST return.

¶17

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶18

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. No.514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

¶19

(Dr. S. Muralidhar)

¶20

Chief Justice

¶21

(R. K. Pattanaik) Judge

¶22

M. Panda

¶23

Page 2 of 2

M/S Sai Enterprises,Jagatsinghpur v. the Principal Commnr.,Cgst,Ce and Customs,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Sai Enterprises,Jagatsinghpur v. the Principal Commnr.,Cgst,Ce and Customs,Bbsr

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.J.Ispat Ltd.,Jajpur Vs Chairman,Cbdt,New Delhi

Dr.Soumya R.Swain Vs P.S.,H.andU.B.Dev.

Darpa Ganjan Pattnai Vs State and Ors.

Subasini Devi Vs Union of India

Deepak Kumar Tripathy Vs Union of India

Dillip Kumar Lenka Vs the Principal Commnr.,Cgst,Ce and Customs,Bbsr