Dismissed
Hari Pangi v. Union of India.
Orissa HCWP(C)/435/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition as it had become infructuous due to the passage of time.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.435 of 2008
¶3
Hari Pangi
¶4
Petitioner
¶5
M/s P.K. Jena, Advocate and associates
¶6
-versus-
¶7
…. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, A.S.G. for Union of India Mr. B.N. Mohanty, Advocate for O.P. No.3
¶8
Union of India and others
¶9
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
¶10
ORDER
¶11
Order No.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Hari Pangi
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
AI extract
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court