The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing the Transport Commissioner to decide the petitioner's pending representation within three months, ensuring notice to the affected party and consideration of their response.
Direction to opposite party to dispose of representation within three months with notice to affected party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.40877 of 2021
Sri Kishore Kumar Mishra …. Petitioner
versus-
State of Odisha, represented through …. Opposite Parties its Secretary, Transport Department, Odisha, Lok Seva Bhawan, Bhubaneswar, Khurda and others.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
18.02.2022
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard.
3. This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner
seeking a direction to the Opposite Party No.2-the Transport Commissioner-cum-Chairman, State Transport Authority, Odisha, Cuttack to dispose of his representation dated 28th September, 2021 under Annexure-1 within a stipulated period.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Chairman, State Transport Authority, Odisha, Cuttack to take a decision on the representation of the Petitioner vide Annexure-1, if the same is pending, within three months of receipt of certified copy of this order by giving notice to the affected party and also taking note of their response.
DA
application.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State Transport Commissioner-cum-Chairman should be directed to dispose of the petitioner's pending representation within three months.
Whether notice should be given to the affected party while deciding the representation.
Sri Kishore Kumar Mishra
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
