The petitioner withdrew his writ petition regarding a mutation case and stoppage of sale deed registration. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn since no one appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 38892 OF 2020
Sri Tophan Kumar Paikaray …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Suvashish Pattnaik, Additional Government Advocate (For Opp. Party Nos.1 and 2)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
13.09.2022
“Therefore, the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue RULE NISI calling upon the opposite parties to file show cause as to why the Mutation Case No.6575 of 2020 pending before the opposite party No.1 (Tahasildar, Pipli) would be dropped and why the Opposite party No.2 (Sub-Registrar, Pipli) would be directed to stop further registration of sale deed relating to suit property situated in village-SUBALPUR, PS-Pipli, PS No.203, Tahasil-Pipli, Tahasil No.334, Khata No.89, Plot No.375, area Ac.0.120 decimals in interest of justice. If the opposite parties would not file show cause, or insufficient cause or cause not to the satisfaction of the Hon’ble Court, appropriate writ may be issued in interest of justice. And for this act of your kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
been filed by learned counsel for the Petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
Sri Tophan Kumar Paikaray
State of Odisha
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
