The petitioner filed a writ petition. Counsel agreed the issue was analogous to a previously dismissed petition. The court dismissed the writ petition by applying the order in the cited precedent.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 36180 of 2021
Ananga Mohan Nayak ….. Petitioner Mr. A.K.Pandey, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Jena, SC, S&ME
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
22.12.2022
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chandra Shekar Sahoo V. State of Odisha and OrsReferred¶12
W.P.(C) No. 17023 of 2012 ( Chandra Shekar Sahoo V. State of Odisha and Ors )
Ananga Mohan Nayak
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
