The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition on the grounds of delay and laches, citing a prior judgment stating that matters pending for two years are not capable of being entertained.
None. The Writ Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 35590 of 2020
State of Odisha & another
….. Petitioners Mr. A.K.Mishra, AGA
Vs.
Sudarsan Bal and another ….. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Dash, Advocate (O.P.1)
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
08.08.2022
Order No. 03.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Arun/Banita
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition should be entertained despite being filed with a delay of two years.
Whether the principles of delay and laches apply to dismiss the writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari DasReferred¶16
State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021)
State of Odisha & another
Sudarsan Bal
B.R. Sarangi
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B.R. Sarangi and Sanjay Kumar Mishra
Parties & counsel
