High Court of Orissa disposed of W.P.(C) No.34517 of 2020 filed by Nabaghana Behera against State of Odisha, holding the petition does not survive in view of a common judgment in a related batch of cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.34517 of 2020
Nabaghana Behera
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Barik, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. A.P. Das, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
02.02.2022
Order No.
TUDU
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersDistinguished¶15
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 _(O.A.T. Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others) and batch
Nabaghana Behera
State of Odisha
Dr. S. Muralidhar
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
