The Court disposed of the writ petition as it no longer survives due to a common judgment in a related batch filed before the same Court. The matter was heard via video conferencing.
Writ petition disposed of as a non-survivor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.34516 of 2020
Umesh Prasad Mallick
…. Petitioner
Mr. R. Acharya, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. A.P. Das, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
02.02.2022
Order No.
TUDU
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
O.A.T. Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and othersRelied on¶15
W.P.(C) No.13789 of 2019 (O.A.T. Association, Cuttack v. Union of India and others)
Umesh Prasad Mallick
State of Odisha and others
Dr. S. Muralidhar
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
