Allowed

Akash Satyanarayan v. Orissa Rural Housing Development Corp. Ltd.

Orissa HC27 Jan 2022WP(C)/34008/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants a direction to the Opposite Party No.1 to examine the Petitioner's grievance and representational matter within one and a half months, considering the grounds and documents filed in the writ petition, due to the inability to direct the specific office internally.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Opposite Party No.1 to examine the petitioner's representation and dispose of the matter within one and a half months.

Akash Satyanarayan Vs Orissa Rural Housing Development… — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.34008 of 2021

¶3

Akash Satyanarayan

¶4

Petitioner(s)

¶5

Mr. H. Mohanty, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

Orissa Rural Housing Development Corp. Ltd. & Anr.

¶8

…. Opposite Party(s)

¶9

CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

ORDER

27.01.2022

Order No.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode. 2. This writ petition involves the following prayer:

¶15

“ PRAYER

¶16

The Petitioner, therefore, prays that this Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to direct the O.P. No.2 to instruct his office to take necessary action on the representation filed by the Petitioner on 07.08.2021 and which was received by the Opposite Party No.10.08.2021 and dispose of the same in accordance with law considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the best interest of justice.”

¶17

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for Petitioner, this Court in disposal of the writ petition directs the Opposite Party No.1 to look into the grievance of the Petitioner vide Annexure-2 (series) more particularly at page 10 of the brief and take a

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

// 2 //

¶20

lawful decision in the matter taking into account the grounds stated in this writ petition so also the documents appended thereto.

¶21

4. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of one & half months from the date of communication of an authenticated copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition by the Petitioner.

¶22

5. As restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Office order circulated vide memo Nos.514 & 515 dated 7^th

¶23

January, 2022.

¶24

Ayaskanta Jena

¶25

(Biswanath Rath)
Judge

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Akash Satyanarayan v. Orissa Rural Housing Development Corp. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash Satyanarayan v. Orissa Rural Housing Development Corp. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basanti Panda Vs State of Odisha

Sk.Muzaffar Mohammad Vs State of Odisha

Barun Kumar Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Narayan Baral Vs State of Odisha

Debasis Sahoo Vs Lopamudra Parida

Himansu Sekhar Behura Vs Monalisa Pattanayak