Petitioner sought direction to release pension arrears of her late husband. Court directed the opposite party to decide on a representation filed, within three months, without expressing opinion on merits.
Direction to opposite party no.4 to decide on the representation filed vide Annexure-5 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 33876 of 2022
Sujata Pradhan
Petitioner
Mr. D.K. Dhar, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
16.12.2022
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent authority should be directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation regarding arrears of pension in a stipulated time.
Sujata Pradhan
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
