Petitioners, claiming authority to manage DAV Public School tax affairs, approached the Court to direct dissolution of representations. Upon hearing, counsel prayed withdrawal, leading to dismissal. The Court disposed of the matter without estimating substantive issues.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 31850 of 2022
Ramkrishna Padhi and others …. Petitioners Mr. Bidyalok Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Ajodhya Ranjan Dash, Additional Government Advocate (For Opposite Party No.1) Mr. Pravakar Behera, Standing Counsel for Transport (For Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
19.12.2022
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
Ramkrishna Padhi
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
