Dismissed
Sasanka Sek.Sahoo v. State and Ors.
Orissa HCWP(C)/3172/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous due to the efflux of time.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.3172 of 2011
¶3
Sasanka Sekhar Sahoo and Others …. Petitioners Mr. B.H. Mohanty, Advocate
¶4
-versus-
¶5
…. Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation Opposite Parties and Others
¶6
Mr. D.K. Mohanty, AGA Mr. D. Mohapatra, Advocate
¶7
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
¶8
ORDER
¶9
04.05.2022
¶10
Order No.
¶11
- With the efflux of time, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik) Judge
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sasanka Sekhar Sahoo and Others
- respondent
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation
Coram
AI extract
R. K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court