Disposed

Dhiren Kumar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC21 Dec 2022WP(C)/28938/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed writ petition seeking sanction of pension, gratuity and retirement benefits treating date of regularization from 2008. Court disposed of petition in light of directions given in Rabindra Kumar Jena case, directing authorities to process papers and grant benefits.

What did the court decide?

Authorities directed to consider pension case, submit papers within one month, and grant benefits within two months from production of certified copy.

Dhiren Kumar Mohanty Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.28938 of 2022

¶3

Dhiren Kumar Mohanty …. Petitioner Mr. Biswabihari Mohanty

¶4

-versus-

¶5

…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. B.P. Tripathy, AGA

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

21.12.2022

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking a direction to the Opposite Parties to sanction and disburse pension, gratuity and all other pensionary/retirement benefits in his favour w.e.f. 01.01.2019 by treating the date of his regularization from 06.08.2008 and release the consequential retirement benefits both current and arrear within a stipulated period of time.

¶14

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the issues involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Rabindra Kumar Jena v. State of Odisha and others decided on 07.12.2022 in W.P.(C) No.36009 of 2021 (batch of cases). The said writ petition was disposed of with the following observations:-

¶15

“26. Therefore, this Court directs the Opposite Parties to consider the case of the Petitioners for pensionary benefits by permitting the Petitioners to submit the pension papers afresh and in that event, if the pension papers, in proper form, are submitted before the authority concerned within a period of one month from today, the authority concerned shall do

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

well to consider the same and grant pensionary benefits as due and admissible to the Petitioners within a period of two months thereafter, if there are no other legal impedement.”

¶18

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is also disposed in

¶19

the light of the direction issued in Paragraph-26 of Rabindra Kumar Jena’s case (supra) which has been quoted hereinabove. The authorities are directed to carry out the aforesaid direction within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of

¶20

this order. The Petitioner is directed to approach the Opposite Parties
along with a certified copy of this order and the order passed in
Rabindra Kumar Jena’s case (supra) within two weeks from today.
5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed
of.
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge

¶21

Debasis

Dhiren Kumar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhiren Kumar Mohanty v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gouranga Badanayak Vs Nalco, Damanjodi

Governing Body of Bata Baba Sankrit College, Tunpur Vs Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department,Khurda

Habibur @ Sk.Habibur Vs State of Odisha

Pravakar Mallick Vs State of Odisha

Sk. Nazar Vs State of Odisha

Saroj Kumar Prusty Vs State of Odisha