Coordinate Bench had already quashed the impugned notification in a related writ petition. The present petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28659 of 2020
Devadatta Subudhi
.… Petitioner
Mr. D.N. Rath, Adv.
State of Odisha and Others
.… Opp.Parties
Mr. B.P. Tripathy, AGA, Mr. S. Behera, Adv. (O.P.-6)
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
10.08.2022
Order No. 09.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
A.K. Rana
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kamala Kanta Das vs. State of Odisha and othersReferred¶16
W.P.(C) No. 230 of 2022 (Kamala Kanta Das vs. State of Odisha and others)
DEVADATTA SUBUDHI
STATE OF ODISHA
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
A. K. RANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
SASHIKANTA MISHRA and A. K. RANA
Parties & counsel
