This single judge order disposed of a writ petition without merits by directing the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation regarding eviction from a quarter within six weeks.
Direction to the opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 and pass appropriate order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27836 of 2022
Udayanath Rout
Petitioner Ms. S. Das, Advocate
Vs.
Paradeep Port Trust and another
Opposite Parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
28.11.2022
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the opposite party to consider the representation within a stipulated time.
Udayanath Rout
Paradeep Port Trust
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
