Dismissed

Maa Ramachandi Ssg Group, Champapedi v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC15 Dec 2022WP(C)/27223/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Orissa considered a Writ Petition seeking a direction to the State to consider a representation regarding the appointment of a dealer for PDS articles. The Court, without merits, directed the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation and pass an order within four weeks. Petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The Court directed Opposite Party No.2 to consider the petitioners' representation vide Annexure-2 and pass an appropriate order within four weeks.

Maa Ramachandi Ssg Group, Champapedi Vs State… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P (C) No.27223 of 2022

¶3

Maa Ramachandi SSG Group, Champapedi & Another

¶4

Petitioners

¶5

Mr. S. Behera, Advocate

¶6

Vs.

¶7

….. State of Odisha & Others Opposite Parties

¶8

State counsel

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

¶11

MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

¶12

ORDER

¶13

15.12.2022

¶14

Order This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. No. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

¶16

The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶17

“In the circumstances, it is humbly prayed to this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notice as to why this case shall not be allowed and the Opp. Party Nos 2 & 3 shall not be directed to allow the petitioner to submit her application along with necessary documents for appointment of dealer for distribution of PDS articles in Champapedi Grama Panchayat under Ranpur Block in the district of Nayagarh by fixing another date.

¶18

And may pass any such other order(s), direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

¶19

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners states that highlighting their grievances, the Petitioners have made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-2 and the same may be directed to be

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

Sangita

¶22

considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶23

5 . As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioners vide Annexure-2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶24

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

¶25

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(B. P. SATAPATHY)
JUDGE

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Maa Ramachandi Ssg Group, Champapedi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maa Ramachandi Ssg Group, Champapedi v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bansidhar Sahoo Vs Land Acquisition Officer and Competent Authority, Cuttack

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd.,Angul Vs Bansidhar Sahu

Bhakta Barik Vs Union of India

Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd., Angul Vs Laxmipriya Pradhan

Bhramar Samal Vs State of Orissa

Sunil Kishan Vs State of Odisha