In this writ petition concerning eviction from land in Kandhamal district, the High Court of Orissa held that the matter was sub-judice before the Tahasildar and declined to entertain the petition, directing petitioners to pursue the remedy before the Tahasildar.
Disposed; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 27217 of 2022
Samiulla Khan and others
….. Petitioners
Mr. B.K. Parida-2, Adv.
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
….. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
14.11.2022
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Ashok
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court of Orissa should entertain the writ petition when the matter is sub-judice before the Tahasildar regarding eviction.
Remedy available to petitioners if eviction steps are taken by the authority pending before the Tahasildar.
Samiulla Khan and others
State of Odisha and others
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
