The High Court of Orissa disposed of the PIL regarding the recoding of a Government school's land, holding no direction was necessary as the land is already recorded in government khata.
The writ petition and I.A. are disposed of in limine without any direction being issued. Remedies in civil suit to be worked out separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) PIL No.26390 of 2019
Basanta Kumar Khatua
…. Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar Mohanty, Advocate -versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate and Mr. Biraja Prasana Das, Advocate for Intervenor
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 04.08.2022
W.P.(C) PIL No.26390 of 2019 and I.A. No.1806 of 2020
Page 1 of 2
necessary since it is a Government school on Government land. As far as the intervention application is concerned, it will be open to the parties to work out their respective remedies in the Civil Suit stated to be pending.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
M. Panda
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Basanta Kumar Khatua
State of Odisha
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
