The Chief Justice, in a single-line order, granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw her writ petition, dismissed the petition accordingly, and vacated the earlier interim order.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 25871 of 2019
Mamita Rauto
…. Petitioner
M/s. P. K. Rath and associates, Advocates
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
20.12.2022
Order No.
05. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The
interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
M. Panda
Mamita Rauto
State of Odisha
M.S. Raman
M. Panda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
