Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Tukuna Senapati Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Tukuna Senapati Vs State of OdishaTukuna Senapati v. State of Odisha

Dismissed

Tukuna Senapati v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC19 Jan 2022WP(C)/23407/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition filed by the petitioner as infructuous without assigning substantive reasons.

What the court decided

AI extract

Cite this judgement

Tukuna Senapati v. State of Odisha, WP(C)/23407/2020 (OD), decided on 19 January 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Dr. S. Muralidhar and R. K. Pattanaik

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the underlying writ petition (W.P.(C) No. 23407 of 2020) as infructuous based solely on the counsel's statement.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23407 of 2020

Tukuna Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Rout, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

…. Opposite Parties Mr. S. N. Das, ASC

CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

19.01.2022

Order No.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. It is disposed of as such.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25^th March, 2020, modified by Notice No.4798, dated 15^th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos. No.514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R. K. Pattanaik)

Judge

M. Panda

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Tukuna Senapati
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

Dr. S. Muralidhar
R. K. Pattanaik

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 19 Jan 2022 · January
Registered: 11 Sept 2020
Case no.: WP(C)/23407/2020
CNR: ODHC010517322020
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: S. Muralidhar CJ R.k.pattanaik
Disposal: Infructuous

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Muralidhar CJ R.k.pattanaik

Sapan Bihari Pati Vs Union of India
18 Jan 2022
Kartik Chandra Sahoo Vs Collector,Jajpur
18 Jan 2022
Subasini Devi Vs Union of India
18 Jan 2022
Dhiraj Biswas Vs State of Odisha
19 Jan 2022
Harekrushna Barik Vs State of Odisha
19 Jan 2022
Lingaraj Patro Vs State of Odisha
19 Jan 2022