Kalpana Baral v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice V. Narasingh disposed of an instant application in W.P.(C) No.23181 of 2015. The application sought recall of an interim order dated 30.03.2022. The court held that since the order had already been passed, there was no scope for recall. The application for modification was rejected.
What did the court decide?
The application for modification stands rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.23181 of 2015
Kalpana Baral
…… Petitioner Mr. S.P.Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …… Opposite Parties
Ms. S.Mishra, ASC
M/S S.K.Ray & S.P.Swain,
Advocates for O.P.No.4
CORAM:
JUSTICE V.NARASINGH
ORDER
13.04.2022
I.A. No.4819 of 2022
Order No.
09. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The I.A. has been filed seeking recall of the order
dated 30.03.2022 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) No.23181
of 2015.
4. Since the order has already been passed, there is no
scope to recall the same.
5. Accordingly, the I.A. for modification stands
rejected.
(V.Narasingh) Judge
2
Dhal
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an interim order passed earlier can be recalled at a later stage.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kalpana Baral
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
V. Narasingh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court