Petitioner's writ petition was disposed of by the High Court of Orissa due to lack of instruction from the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh petition if a cause of action exists.
Liberty to file afresh if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 23152 of 2013
Chanda Parasramka
…. Petitioner
Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. Deputy Director (Revenue) Opposite Party ESIC
Mr. P.P. Ray, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
04.
ORDER 07.09.2022
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Ayesha
Page 1 of 1
Chanda Parasramka
Deputy Director (Revenue) Opposite Party ESIC
V. Narasimha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
