A single-line order disposing of a writ petition where the respondent bank was directed to consider the petitioner's representation and inform her of the result within two weeks instead of issuing a notice.
Direct the respondent bank to consider the petitioner's representation and inform her of the result within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.22499 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Gita Gantayata
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.K.Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
…. Zonal Manager, UCO Bank and Opposite Parties another
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
01.
ORDER 10.10.2022
1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner
and submits, prayer of his client is for directing the bank to pass speaking order on consideration of her representation dated 25th July, 2022.
2. In view of the prayer, Court is not inclined to direct issuance of notice. Instead, opposite party no.2 is directed to consider and deal
with petitioner’s representation dated 25th July, 2022 and inform her the result, within two weeks of communication.
3. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Gita Gantayata
Zonal Manager, UCO Bank
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
