The petitioner filed a writ petition but appeared without instructions. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition for want of instructions, leaving the door open for future approach if a cause of action survives.
Petition dismissed for want of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 20284 of 2013
M/s Comtech Engineering
….. Petitioner Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Adv.
Vs.
Union of India and others
….. Opposite parties
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
22.02.2022
Order No.
Ashok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(V. NARASINGH)
JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
M/s Comtech Engineering
Union of India
DR. B.R. SARANGI
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
