This court allowed the writ petition filed by a financer for vehicle release. The state averred the vehicle was not detained at the PS and no case existed. The petition was dismissed as baseless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 19409 of 2022
Santosh Kumar Sahoo and another ..… Petitioners Mr. Manas Ranjan Khatua, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra, Additional Government Advocate (For Opposite Party Nos.1, 2 & 3)
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 17.10.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
the said vehicle. Thus, the allegation of the Petitioner is baseless.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 2 of 2
Santosh Kumar Sahoo and another
State of Odisha and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
