The Court disposed of a writ petition wherein the petitioner sought direction for disbursement of 3rd RACP benefits and pay fixation. The Court directed the respondent to decide on the petitioner's representation within three months.
Directed respondent to decide on petitioner's representation regarding RACP benefits and pay fixation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTACK
W.P.(C) No.18529 of 2022 Dhirendranath Sahu ….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order
No
ORDER
29.7.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayer:-
“ to direct the Opp. party No.1 to sanction and disburse the 3rd RACP benefits of Rs.5400/- w.e.f 15.10.2014 on completion of 30 years of service as per Anneuxre-2 and fixation of his pay in Level No.12 of the 7th pay w.e.f 1.1.2016 with revision and accordingly all arrear may be disbursed to the petitioner with revision of pension within a time stipulation as fixed by this Hon’ble Court.”
4. The Petitioner has moved before Opposite Party No.1 seeking redressal of his grievances as made in the representation under Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of
the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation of the petitioner, taking into
// 2 //
account Annexures-4 & 5. in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
sangita
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State is directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding 3rd RACP benefits and pay fixation within three months.
Directions issued to the opposite party No.1 to take a decision on the pending grievances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhirendranath Sahu
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
